Recently, the Seattle
Post-Intelligencer reported that traces of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aurerus, the bacteria
commonly known as MRSA, are present on swine farms in the Midwest, prompting
some members of Congress and public health advocates to call for an investigation
of our food supply for the presence of the bacteria. While we here at Keep Our
Food Safe are strong advocates of vigilance when it comes to protecting our nation’s
food supply, this reaction may be a little too premature. Let me explain.
Staphylococcus
aurerus is a bacteria
found in many forms; sometimes it can cause an infection, but not always. In fact, about one-third of the people in
this country are colonized with the
staph bacteria. But don’t worry, that
just means the bacteria is present on their body somewhere, not necessarily
causing an infection. Staph bacteria is
the most common cause of minor skin infections, like pimples and boils, and is
usually treated with antibiotics. But staph
infections can also be responsible for more serious illnesses, like pneumonia,
which is why it’s so important to practice good hygiene to minimize the chance
of the bacteria spreading.
Human strains of MRSA are some of
the more deadly types of staph infections.
What puts the MR in MRSA is the fact that this strain is resistant to
the antibiotic methicillin, making infection difficult to treat. The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention estimates about 1.5 percent of the U.S. population is colonized with
MRSA.
For a long time, health officials
thought MRSA was only present in people, but evidence of colonization has been
found in our dogs, cats, horses and pigs.
Additionally, a report surfaced indicating the bacteria was present in
pork in the Netherlands and Canada.
Since the United States imports more than 760 million pounds of Canadian
pork, Dr. Tara Smith, an epidemiologist from the University of Iowa College of
Public Health, was prompted to conduct
a series of tests on swine farms in Iowa and Illinois. Dr. Smith’s report
indicated nearly 70 percent of the pigs and more than 60 percent of workers
tested positive for a MRSA colonization.
But before you fill up your
garbage can with all the pork in your freezer, it’s important to think about a
few things. The sample size Dr. Smith
used to conduct her study was incredibly small – 299 pigs and only 20 employees
– and what she found was a unique strain of MRSA unrelated to the strains causing
human illness. In addition, MRSA
colonization was present on only one of the farms.
Dr. Smith suggested in her report
that there might be a link between the use of antibiotics and the presence of
MRSA in the swine, and that perhaps the use resulted in an increased incidence
of MRSA in the animals. She makes a good point, but if this particular MRSA
isn’t causing the animals to get sick and it’s not causing humans to get sick,
we should probably make sure that the use of those antibiotics is actually a
bad thing before we go jumping to conclusions.
Antibiotics can be a good
thing. They really don’t stay in the animal’s
system long enough that you’d be consuming antibiotics. Plus antibiotics keep both animals and people
healthy, and without them, more diseases can spread. The American
Veterinary Medical Association agrees.
Bottom line? Colonization
means the bacteria is present, not that infection is present. And while it may be worthwhile to test
livestock and workers to minimize occupational hazards, most public health
officials and food animal veterinarians agree MRSA transmission is not a problem
in our food supply. So as always,
practice good hygiene and cook your meat according to the directions
or to suggestions by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. As for
that ham sandwich? Go ahead and enjoy.
Comments